🔗 Share this article

The Four Spent the Day Together centers on protagonists pursuing new beginnings, trying to break free from drugs or harmful partnerships, only to find hope curdling into conflict. The author repeatedly invokes the phrase "new beginning", making it intentionally weary through recurring use. Phrases such as "He could make a fresh start" and "They decided to make a fresh start" are scattered across the story. And yet, the author herself appears to be undertaking her personal new beginning, since this seems a novel form of writing – documentarian, genuinely novelistic. But then it turns out to be packed with the familiar conflicts and styles as past novels.

From Accidental Writer to Renowned Book

The writer began as an artist who became a writer unintentionally with her 1997 groundbreaking book I Love Dick, structured as letters to an unreceptive lover, converting confessional female writing from abjection into rebellion. She persisted as a writer, but the following three engaging and challenging novels missed the power and directness that the correspondence format infused into the voice of I Love Dick. This was not aided by was her position as a nonconformist creator who had evolved into a extensive real estate holder, so there was much discussion on property transactions. It makes sense that she now wants to explore new kinds of material, directing her gaze to external narratives, at a time when she asserts that Trumpian politics turns intimate literature unnecessary.

Several Eras, One Unescapable Past

The Four Spent the Day Together is structured in three parts, encompassing three generations – each trapped by their histories. There is the narrative about characters Emma and Jasper, versions of the author's parents, moving from the Bronx to the Connecticut countryside. There is the account of Kraus, in the persona of protagonist Catt Greene, reckoning with the late recognition of I Love Dick, the rise of Trump, and her partner struggling with addiction her husband Paul. Finally the story of the murder of one lost young man by another in a community long abandoned by forward-thinking policies only a brief drive from Catt's rural residence in rural Minnesota.

From my perspective as a reader drawn to polished prose of the sort Kraus herself often avoids, I was seduced by the literary tone of the first section.

As a reader who favors precise prose of the kind that Kraus herself tends to eschew, I was won over by the novelistic voice of the first section. It exhibits a new quality of attentiveness that allows space for minutiae, like the pail that the young Catt frees from the ice at the start of the story, aided by her beloved father. "I discovered a frozen plaything!" she says; "a great plaything", he responds, "the nuanced interpretations of terms tumbling in their mouths like piece candy". The author narrates Emma's narrative with interest and closeness. "It seemed to Emma she had entered a dream – not hers, exactly."

Disappointment and Disjunction

I was bound to become frustrated when I hoped this fresh tone could persist to the end. Kraus says here that she resents the enjoyment readers like me have derived from I Love Dick; she's committed to disjunction, to the unpolished style she shares with her inspiration writer Kathy Acker, and the void and recurrence of her past books reasserts itself in the second segment. The protagonist is trying to renovate 36 run-down apartments in the city's most challenging districts while shuttling between two different states, failing to help Paul control his drinking. She feels helpless as her spouse moves between poorly supported positions as an addiction therapist in a environment propelled by the hostility and dread that drives an electoral success. A significant portion discusses about the protagonist facing cancellation on Twitter, her professional designation altered from "author" to "landlord" on Wikipedia. Kraus still seems to be overly concerned about this. In a moment she states that she's researching the homicide so that before departing the state, "she might be able to learn something about an America that her Twitter detractors would be unable to grasp, would not even see".

The Murder Narrative

Then we reach to the murder itself – and the eponymous day experienced by the murdered individual with the murderer and his associates. Kraus has great source material, and details moment by moment what transpired when a man named Brandon came to visit Brittney after meeting her on an app where she marketed explicit images. He sought a sexual encounter but seems amiably to have occupied the day in the company of her associates, mooching around fixing his automobile and funding treats and narcotics, before being shot by Brittney's partner a man named Micah – a youth with psychological issues who has repeatedly received inpatient care for violent rage.

Preoccupation and Open Ends

The protagonist becomes fixated by the account, and I found myself captivated by the way that the author's conflicting impulses towards responsible documentation and audacious rule-breaking tussle in this section. However, I would have preferred her to go further into her own obsessions here. The compelling persona is Brittney, who becomes vivid partly through the protagonist's connection to her – yet another intelligent, harassed young woman derailing in a difficult, overlooked locality. Kraus tells us that Catt speaks to Brittney in detention, but she doesn't dramatise these conversations. The complete segment feels oddly unfinished, to the degree that her narrative ends almost mid-par