🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils will be slashed by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to put the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have one or more councillors depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils could only create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time building community backing and urging their local governments to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required local authorities that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it aims to terminate “race-based” policies, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation indicated the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that voted to keep their wards.