🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where election day turned out somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously went for Zohran this year. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He has just over 50% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he does because then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. However no, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.